Evangelicals Confront Moral Horrors (14 views) Subscribe   
   From:  David (DavidABrown)    Feb-11 7:26 am  
To:  ALL   (1 of 1)  
 
  801.1  
 
Source: www.ChristianityToday.com

Confronting Moral Horror
It's a witness even the most jaded find impressive.
By Charles Colson with Anne Morse | posted 02/04/2004

"Why are evangelicals so concerned about AIDS in Africa and sex trafficking and slavery in Sudan? I thought all you cared about was abortion and gay rights."

The reporter from a prestigious journal had been following the Bush administration's foreign policy initiatives and stumbled onto a curious fact: Evangelicals were behind most of them.

The reporter's question gave me a wonderful opportunity to explain that evangelicals believe in the sanctity and dignity of all human lifenot just unborn children, but also Sudanese slaves, sex trafficking victims, and Africans with AIDS.

The reporter got it; her subsequent front-page story contained unusual praise for evangelicals. This experience offers an insight on how we can make a powerful witness.

Over the past few years, evangelicals have actively promoted a morally grounded foreign policy. Six years ago, when no one was talking about the horror of sex trafficking, conservative activist Bill Bennett and Iprodded by the indefatigable human rights champion Michael Horowitzhelped organize a coalition to fight this evil. We testified to Congress in opposition to the Clinton administration, which had caved in to radical feminists who argued that prostitution should be redefined as "sex work"just another empowering career option, like nursing or teaching.

Because of the leadership of Christians like Frank Wolf, Chris Smith, Joe Pitts, and others in Congress, legislation passed in 2000 authorizing sanctions. When the Bush administration took over, it appointed an "abolitionist"gutsy former Congressman John Millerto lead the trafficking office.

During his speech to the United Nations last year, President Bush powerfully decried the "special evil" of sex trafficking. The reporter interviewing me said she was astonished by the President's speechraising moral issues before the U.N.? "Was this informed by his faith?" she asked.

Evangelicals led by Franklin Graham aroused our consciences over Africans with AIDS. The President himself was passionate, but he faced much oppositionparticularly because he supported the ABC program (abstinence first, being monogamous, condoms only if necessary). Several of us met with the President and helped mobilize the Christian community. The result: A $15 billion package that not only treats the sick but also prevents AIDS through abstinence.

Then there's slavery in Sudanthe first matter Bennett and I raised with White House political strategist Karl Rove after President Bush was elected. The administration got tough, appointing former Senator John Danforth as special envoy, and the evangelical community flexed its muscles to move Congress. The result: The Sudan Peace Act, which has given us the best chance ever to end the slavery and genocide being committed against fellow believers.

President Bush clearly has this moral agenda in mind. He made his first human-rights appeal in an eloquent but little-noted speech to the American Jewish Committee in May 2001. Then, in his Whitehall Palace speech in November 2003, he defended morally based foreign policy. The staid British audience was in awe as the President spoke of tracing our nation's spiritual roots to Britain's evangelical movement of the 18th and 19th centuries. He spoke of the "tireless compassion of Lord Shaftesbury, the righteous courage of Wilberforce," and of the Good News "translated by Tyndale, preached by Wesley, lived out in the example of William Booth."

"The deepest beliefs of our nations set the direction of our foreign policy," the President said. "We value our own civil rights, so we stand for the human rights of others. We affirm the God-given dignity of every person, so we are moved to action by poverty and oppression and famine and disease."

So it must be with today's evangelicals. Following in the steps of Wilberforce, we must confront the moral horrors of our day. And when we work for causes that people across the political spectrum understand as promoting human good, we break out of the stereotypical "Bible-thumping bigot" mold.

We don't do it for that reason, of course; we do it because it is our calling. But when the world sees us defending the poor, the enslaved, the persecuted, and the sex trafficking victim, our arguments about protecting the unborn and the dignity of all human life have credibility.

This credibility extends all the way to the pages of The New York Times, where columnist Nicholas Kristof recently wrote: "I've lost my cynicism about evangelical groups partly because I've seen them at work abroad."

To much of the watching world, our determined concern for "the least of these" in every land may be our most powerful witness.

Copyright  2004 Christianity Today.
February 2004, Vol. 48, No. 2, Page 128






David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
 
